IEEE VIS 2024 Content: Touching the Ground: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Data Physicalizations for Spatial Data Analysis Tasks

Honorable Mention

Touching the Ground: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Data Physicalizations for Spatial Data Analysis Tasks

Bridger Herman - University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States

Cullen D. Jackson - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States

Daniel F. Keefe - University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States

Screen-reader Accessible PDF

Room: Bayshore I

2024-10-17T18:21:00ZGMT-0600Change your timezone on the schedule page
2024-10-17T18:21:00Z
Exemplar figure, described by caption below
Data physicalizations provide many potential benefits over digital data displays, including haptic perception and body-centric judgments. This paper compares the effectiveness of physicalizations (left) with virtual reality (right top) and 2D visualizations (right bottom) for spatial data analysis tasks on digital elevation data common in climate science and natural resource management.
Fast forward
Full Video
Keywords

Data physicalization, virtual reality, evaluation.

Abstract

Abstract—Inspired by recent advances in digital fabrication, artists and scientists have demonstrated that physical data encodings (i.e., data physicalizations) can increase engagement with data, foster collaboration, and in some cases, improve data legibility and analysis relative to digital alternatives. However, prior empirical studies have only investigated abstract data encoded in physical form (e.g., laser cut bar charts) and not continuously sampled spatial data fields relevant to climate and medical science (e.g., heights, temperatures, densities, and velocities sampled on a spatial grid). This paper presents the design and results of the first study to characterize human performance in 3D spatial data analysis tasks across analogous physical and digital visualizations. Participants analyzed continuous spatial elevation data with three visualization modalities: (1) 2D digital visualization; (2) perspective-tracked, stereoscopic "fishtank" virtual reality; and (3) 3D printed data physicalization. Their tasks included tracing paths downhill, looking up spatial locations and comparing their relative heights, and identifying and reporting the minimum and maximum heights within certain spatial regions. As hypothesized, in most cases, participants performed the tasks just as well or better in the physical modality (based on time and error metrics). Additional results include an analysis of open-ended feedback from participants and discussion of implications for further research on the value of data physicalization. All data and supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/7xdq4/.