IEEE VIS 2024 Content: A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design Space

A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design Space

Md Dilshadur Rahman - University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

Ghulam Jilani Quadri - University of Oklahoma, Norman, United States. University of Oklahoma, Norman, United States

Bhavana Doppalapudi - University of South Florida , Tampa, United States. University of South Florida , Tampa, United States

Danielle Albers Szafir - University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States

Paul Rosen - University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

Room: Bayshore V

Wednesday, October 16th, 2024 @ 12:42GMT+00:00Change your timezone on the schedule page
2 months agoYour current time: Monday, Dec 30th @ 08:38
Exemplar figure, described by caption below
A line chart from The Washington Post illustrates COVID-19 peak comparisons, plotting time on the horizontal axis and percentage growth relative to the January 2021 peak vertically: top-left shows the baseline chart with basic visualization elements (i.e., axes, labels, lines, legends, and gridlines) but with annotations removed; top-right uses color+enclosure+text ensembles of annotations to help identify the peaks of different COVID-19 waves; bottom-left uses text+connector ensembles to present additional context from the associated article; and bottom-right displays the completely annotated chart.
Fast forward
Full Video
Keywords

Annotations, visualizations, qualitative study, design space, taxonomy

Abstract

Annotations play a vital role in highlighting critical aspects of visualizations, aiding in data externalization and exploration, collaborative sensemaking, and visual storytelling. However, despite their widespread use, we identified a lack of a design space for common practices for annotations. In this paper, we evaluated over 1,800 static annotated charts to understand how people annotate visualizations in practice. Through qualitative coding of these diverse real-world annotated charts, we explored three primary aspects of annotation usage patterns: analytic purposes for chart annotations (e.g., present, identify, summarize, or compare data features), mechanisms for chart annotations (e.g., types and combinations of annotations used, frequency of different annotation types across chart types, etc.), and the data source used to generate the annotations. We then synthesized our findings into a design space of annotations, highlighting key design choices for chart annotations. We presented three case studies illustrating our design space as a practical framework for chart annotations to enhance the communication of visualization insights. All supplemental materials are available at \url{https://shorturl.at/bAGM1}.